Gavin Newsom Sues Fox News for $787 Million Over Shocking Trump Tapping Accusation

The Bombshell Lawsuit: Newsom Takes on Fox News

In a legal move that’s sending shockwaves through the media world, Governor Gavin Newsom of California has filed a $787 million defamation lawsuit against Fox News Corporation. The lawsuit, filed in California Superior Court, accuses the network of broadcasting knowingly false and defamatory statements tying Newsom to an alleged wiretap on Donald Trump.

Key Allegations:

• Doctored audio clips aired by Jesse Watters falsely suggest Newsom illegally monitored Trump
• Fox reportedly ignored multiple fact-checking warnings
• The narrative was pushed across various Fox programs even after being debunked

This mirrors Fox’s earlier legal troubles with Dominion Voting Systems, which resulted in a $787 million settlement in 2023..

The Trump Factor: Legal War Meets Political Feud

While Fox is the main target, the lawsuit hints at a broader political conspiracy involving Donald Trump’s inner circle. According to filings:

• The wiretapping claim originated from pro-Trump media outlets
• Fox amplified the narrative without proper vetting
• The incident aligns with Newsom’s growing national political profile, possibly threatening Trump’s influence

Newsom’s legal team may expand the lawsuit to include Trump associates, based on ongoing discovery..

Is Gavin Newsom a Lawyer? Meet the Legal Team Behind the Lawsuit

Gavin Newsom is not a licensed attorney, but his legal team includes:

• Attorneys from the Dominion vs. Fox News case
• First Amendment and defamation experts
• Digital forensic analysts to authenticate the alleged audio fabrication

His prior experience as California Lieutenant Governor and Mayor of San Francisco gives him insight into high-level litigation and media narratives.

Impact: Could This Case Reshape the Media Industry?

For Fox News:

• Another major financial blow
• Brand credibility further eroded
• Risk of increased editorial oversight requirements

For Media at Large:

• Fact-checking standards may become stricter
• Legal boundaries between opinion and defamation may be redefined
• Encourages ethical journalism in political coverage

Legal observers say Fox may aim to settle quietly as with the Dominion case to avoid further reputational harm.

Timeline: From Allegation to Lawsuit

Expert Reactions: What the Legal Community Is Saying

Elena Kagan, Harvard Law Prof.:

“This tests the boundaries between free speech and reckless defamation.”

Mark Geragos, High-Profile Attorney:

“Fox’s repeat offenses make this case legally dangerous for them.”

Floyd Abrams, First Amendment Scholar:

“The central question is whether Fox acted with ‘actual malice.’”

Conclusion: A Defining Test of Media Accountability

Gavin Newsom’s $787 million lawsuit could become a landmark case in defamation law, particularly regarding how powerful media outlets handle unverified political claims. The stakes are enormous not just for Newsom and Fox News, but for the future of press responsibility in American democracy.

Will Fox double down and fight the claims? Or will it seek another costly settlement? The media world and the public is watching closely.

Sources: cnn.com, theguardian.com, nytimes.com.

Sandra Williams

Sandra is a science enthusiast and a researcher by nature. Her articles are informative and eloquent in equal measures, and always include knowledge that is verified by authentic sources. She is a maven at health related sciences and takes an interest in new scientific findings from all facets of the subject. Her column is a ready reckoner on all that is going on in the world of scientific study, and health sciences, including disease outbreaks, their causes, and prevention measures being taken.

View all posts